2013
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An augmentation technique for large deformation frictional contact problems

Abstract: SUMMARYThe present work deals with a new approach to frictional large deformation contact problems. In particular, a new formulation of the frictional kinematics is introduced that is based on a specific augmentation technique used for the introduction of additional variables. This augmentation technique substantially simplifies the formulation of the whole system. A size reduction of the resulting system of algebraic equations is proposed. Consequently, the augmentation technique does not lead to an increase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact contribution The underlying contact description is based on the description given in [10]. Note, as mentioned earlier, the phase-field and the contact boundaries do not depend on each other.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact contribution The underlying contact description is based on the description given in [10]. Note, as mentioned earlier, the phase-field and the contact boundaries do not depend on each other.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such a static condensation is not desired or not feasible (e.g., when choosing a standard basis rather than dual basis functions for the Lagrange multipliers, see, e.g., References 24,26), the linear system remains in its generalized saddle point format arising from the contact constraint equations. Both the standard and the dual mortar approach have become increasingly popular in recent years, with new contributions focusing for example on higher-order finite element interpolation, 27,28 isogeometric mortar methods, [29][30][31][32][33] or improved robustness of the solution algorithms, [34][35][36] to name only a few particularly active research directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47,81]), the linear system remains in its generalized saddle point format arising from the contact constraint equations. Both the standard and the dual mortar approach have become increasingly popular in recent years, with new contributions focusing for example on higher-order finite element interpolation [49,83], isogeometric mortar methods [16,60,62,63,86], or improved robustness of the solution algorithms [21,30,51], to name only a few particularly active research directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one can see from (21), SIMPLE does not affect the terms that operate on the primary displacement variables, but it perturbs the Lagrange multipliers. Choosing S = αZ + αC 2 K −1 C T 1 , the error matrix reduces to…”
Section: Simple Variants Originally Introduced Inmentioning
confidence: 99%