2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Australian survey of women's use of pregnancy and parenting apps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
194
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
17
194
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These included critical content analyses of reproduction and pregnancy apps and self-monitoring devices [31][32][33][34], an online survey competed in late 2014 by 410 women around Australia who were either pregnant or had given birth in the previous three years [35] and a focus group study involving Sydney women fitting the same description, which took place in mid-2015 [36]. The research questions around which both the survey and focus groups were framed were: How are women using digital media for both pregnancy and parenting?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included critical content analyses of reproduction and pregnancy apps and self-monitoring devices [31][32][33][34], an online survey competed in late 2014 by 410 women around Australia who were either pregnant or had given birth in the previous three years [35] and a focus group study involving Sydney women fitting the same description, which took place in mid-2015 [36]. The research questions around which both the survey and focus groups were framed were: How are women using digital media for both pregnancy and parenting?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, current understandings of mobile apps need to be related to an emerging body of literature that explores the relationship between self-tracking practices, surveillance, and flows of personal identifying information (Crawford, Lingel, & Karppi, 2015;Dijck, 2014;Lupton, 2012Lupton, , 2013bLupton, , 2014aLupton, , 2016Morozov, 2013). In fact, as Lupton (2016) has rightly shown, it is impossible to look at mobile apps without unraveling the complex relationship between digital practices of self-monitoring and the political economy of big data.…”
Section: The App Economy Data Mining and Pregnancy Appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2013 Australian study found that 40% of 35 participants had used at least one smartphone app to access pregnancy information [13]. In 2015, a larger Australian survey study of 410 women reported the proportion of pregnancy app users as 73%, the vast majority (92%) finding them to be useful [8,14]. The most valued feature was providing useful information (83%), mainly about fetal development (89%) or pregnancy-related changes in their bodies (71%) [8].…”
Section: The General Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering pregnancy apps, interactive features include: regular notifications, videos and data storage capability e.g. for photos, taking notes, pregnancy tracking, and "personalised tools to assess nutrition, fitness and weight" [14,20]. Women also value pregnancy apps and digital platforms "that are multifunctional and interact with each other" [6].…”
Section: The General Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%