“…By comparing the results of the assessment tests on essay questions between automation and human raters, the problem frame can be seen whether there are significant differences, as the human rater can be labor-intensive and time-consuming (Zhang, 2013), whereas automation process brings otherwise results (Dong et al, 2017;Wong & Bong, 2019). By using the AES, statistical proof of the automation assessment results at the validity and reliability level becomes a benchmark, whether the consistency of the results supports the resulting accuracy value, or it still requires other proof from the human rater; the prediction results show the same/not much difference (Buditjahjanto et al, 2022). This phenomenon is still a topic of conversation in vocational education regarding the quality of outcomes of students at Akademi Komunitas Negeri (AKN) Pacitan and Blitar (research locus), because currently the competency test assessment still uses a human rater, and has an impact on recognizing ownership of a competency certificate as a competency in mastering knowledge, skills, and attitudes (Watkins, 2020).…”