The 4th Annual IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control and Intelligent 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cyber.2014.6917491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated method to calibrate industrial robot kinematic parameters using Spherical Surface constraint approach

Abstract: This paper describes our new method and updated system for industrial robot kinematic parameters calibration. The system consists of an IRB 120 industrial robot, a laser tool attached to the robot's end-effector, a rotatable position sensitive detector (PSD), and a PC based controller. In the process of calibration, the surface of the PSD can be rotated around a fixed center, and the center points of PSD surface keep in a same 3D spherical surface. In the each position, the laser beams with small angles are ai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For robots, many researchers proposed a scheme to identify the D-H parameters from the measurement of the end effector position. For easier and lower-cost measurement, some researchers presented the measurement of the end effector position when it is nominally constrained at a point [10], [11], on a line [12], on a spherical surface [13,14], or on a plane [15]. Recently, more researches employ either a laser tracker [16,17] or a vision-based measurement system [18][19][20], which can measure the end effector's 3D position at arbitrary positions over the entire workspace.…”
Section: Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For robots, many researchers proposed a scheme to identify the D-H parameters from the measurement of the end effector position. For easier and lower-cost measurement, some researchers presented the measurement of the end effector position when it is nominally constrained at a point [10], [11], on a line [12], on a spherical surface [13,14], or on a plane [15]. Recently, more researches employ either a laser tracker [16,17] or a vision-based measurement system [18][19][20], which can measure the end effector's 3D position at arbitrary positions over the entire workspace.…”
Section: Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length errors of the first and second links, ∆L 1 and ∆L 2 , can be calculated by Eqs. (12) and (13).…”
Section: Identification Of Bidirectional Angular Position Deviation O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…across all robot configurations. This metric is sensitive to all sources of error including registration error, joint-offset error, measurement error, and other unmodeled robot factors as discussed in Section I. Consequently, the actual robot accuracy is less than e as calculated in (18) since a robot's accuracy would only depend on joint-offset error and unmodeled dynamics. As shown in Table IV, the average absolute positioning error of the robot is over 4 mm with the Vernier remastering method regardless of reference sensor.…”
Section: B Post-registration Cartesian Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robot positioning errors were reduced to 0.572 mm from over 3 cm. In several works, Y. Liu et al leveraged a low-cost PSD and laser pointer to automate the process of calculating zerooffset parameters through numerical optimization [10], [16]- [18]. Some results showed reduction in positioning errors from over 3 cm to within 0.898 mm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration methods utilize an active end-point constraint with the inexpensive device are proposed. In [12], a sphere surface constraint approach with a position sensitive device was presented. Zhu [13] proposed a kinematic self-calibration method by axis constraint with a camera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%