2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated positioning system for monitoring chickens’ location: Accuracy and registration success in a free-range area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the systems can be affected by the surroundings. For example, metals or water in the environment may affect RFID systems [35], while UWB systems may miss registrations when tags are in a (partially) covered position (e.g., [36]; also for a discussion on how to deal with missing UWB registrations). In this study the surroundings were kept the same as much as possible, so it would be expected that the influence of water, metals and coverage of tags was the same across the entire trial and therefore the differences between days may simply reflect random noise.…”
Section: Rfid Versus Uwbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the systems can be affected by the surroundings. For example, metals or water in the environment may affect RFID systems [35], while UWB systems may miss registrations when tags are in a (partially) covered position (e.g., [36]; also for a discussion on how to deal with missing UWB registrations). In this study the surroundings were kept the same as much as possible, so it would be expected that the influence of water, metals and coverage of tags was the same across the entire trial and therefore the differences between days may simply reflect random noise.…”
Section: Rfid Versus Uwbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems could be used in commercial farms and potentially track thousands of birds. In addition, an RFID system based on ultra-wideband technology was developed for monitoring 42 individual chickens' locations in the 100 m × 100 m experimental field, which could calculate the position with 0.29 m of the median error and 68% of the registration rate (Stadig et al, 2018a). Monitoring of outdoor range use at the individual level allows for correlation between ranging and welfare indicators such as tonic immobility test, plumage damage, foot health and spatial cognition (Campbell et al, 2016(Campbell et al, , 2018a(Campbell et al, and 2018bHartcher et al, 2016;Larsen et al, 2018;Taylor et al, 2018).…”
Section: Tracking Movement and Feeding Behaviour Of Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technologies that used radio frequency data transmission were classified as RFID and were present in four papers (7.0%). These ITs were used to evaluate broilers' behaviour in free-range systems: monitoring their location [71], evaluating their ranging behaviour [72,73], and assessing if a RFID tag placed on their back could interfere with their behaviour [45].…”
Section: Radio Frequency Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%