2003
DOI: 10.1002/vis.310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automated pottery archival and reconstruction system

Abstract: Motivated by the current requirements of archaeologists, we are developing an automated archival system for archaeological classification and reconstruction of ceramics. Our system uses the profile of an archaeological fragment, which is the cross‐section of the fragment in the direction of the rotational axis of symmetry, to classify and reconstruct it virtually. Ceramic fragments are recorded automatically by a 3D measurement system based on structured (coded) light. The input data for the estimation of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey of the archaeological literature shows that the concept of applying computers to generate ceramic classifications and store large datasets of ceramic information in databases is not new (Bishop et al 2005;Durham et al 1995;Hall and Laflin 1984;Kampel and Sablatnig 2003;Lengyel 1975;Lewis and K. J. Goodson 1991;Liu et al 2005;Main 1978;Sablatnig and Menard 1997;Schurmans et al 2001). However, these attempts have primarily focused on small datasets; simple methods of ceramic classification and have not progressed beyond their initial demonstration phases.…”
Section: Past Methods Of Automatic Objective Ceramic Classification Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of the archaeological literature shows that the concept of applying computers to generate ceramic classifications and store large datasets of ceramic information in databases is not new (Bishop et al 2005;Durham et al 1995;Hall and Laflin 1984;Kampel and Sablatnig 2003;Lengyel 1975;Lewis and K. J. Goodson 1991;Liu et al 2005;Main 1978;Sablatnig and Menard 1997;Schurmans et al 2001). However, these attempts have primarily focused on small datasets; simple methods of ceramic classification and have not progressed beyond their initial demonstration phases.…”
Section: Past Methods Of Automatic Objective Ceramic Classification Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum fragment size can be determined by estimation of the gaussian curvature κ min in respect to noise and resolution of the 3D-scanner [9]. As ceramics are not perfectly symmetric, the minimum size required for proper orientation depends on the technique used for manufacturing.…”
Section: Circle Templatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall and Laflin (1984) used B-spline methods to convert digitized pottery containers silhouettes into one or more mathematical curves (see also Smith 1985;Kampel and Sablatnig 2003b;Mom 2005Mom , 2006Nautiyal et al 2006). Polynomial interpolation has a long history in archaeology, especially in the case of pottery studies.…”
Section: Edge Curvature As Shape Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%