2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery 2010
DOI: 10.1109/fskd.2010.5569326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic classification method for patents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, several parts in patent should be selected to represent the technical information. Chi Xue [8] found that selecting title, abstract and technical field as the patent innovation parts has the best classification results by the patent parts selection tests and analysis. Actually patent retrieval is similar to classification.…”
Section: Retrieval Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, several parts in patent should be selected to represent the technical information. Chi Xue [8] found that selecting title, abstract and technical field as the patent innovation parts has the best classification results by the patent parts selection tests and analysis. Actually patent retrieval is similar to classification.…”
Section: Retrieval Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After adding the position weight, standardize the improved weight by the formula (4), (5) and then calculate the improved similarity through the formula (8).…”
Section: Retrieval Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the analysis of patent text, it is found that the training of the automatic patent classifier can be completed by extracting a few representative contents of patent documents, which can improve the PAC efficiency while maintaining the accuracy of PAC. Relevant research results show that satisfactory accuracy can be achieved by extracting the contents of patent abstract [6] or claims [7] in the tasks of patent classification. Therefore, this paper uses the titles and abstracts of patent documents to form the input data for training, and then uses the corresponding 'sections' or 'classes' labels to construct the target samples for PAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually assumed in these methods that the document set consists of general documents with flat labels. Even though these methods have also been used to select features for patent documents with IPC labels [11, 12], they still utilize general class labels with a flat structure. For example, Tseng et al [11] used categories such as ‘FED’ and ‘Device’ to calculate the value of the correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Tseng et al [11] used categories such as ‘FED’ and ‘Device’ to calculate the value of the correlation coefficient. Xue et al [12] classified patents into four categories: ‘controlling and regulating device’, ‘cylinder and motor device’, ‘muffle and shock absorption device’ and ‘safety device’ in their experiment. The unique hierarchical feature of the system has never previously been considered as a way to improve classification accuracy for the upper or all levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%