2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013rs005223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic scaling technique for obtaining F2 parameters and F1 critical frequency from vertical incidence ionograms

Abstract: [1] Recent advances in computing technologies have renewed interest in the intelligent systems for automatic interpretation of ionograms, images obtained by remote sensing of the ionospheric plasma. The ionogram "autoscaling" techniques based on the template matching method, previously rendered unrealistic for their computing complexity, have now become feasible. This work presents an automatic scaling technique for extracting the main features of the F 1 and F 2 layers of the ionosphere, such as critical freq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptable value of autoscaled h'F2 can reach to about 92.15% for all the autoscaled foF2. (Similar to previous studies (Jiang et al, ), an acceptable value is within ±25 km of the manual value for the height.) Table shows that the accuracy of the autoscaled h'F2 can increase to 95.75% for the acceptable value if ionograms with Es layer were removed (subset F).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The acceptable value of autoscaled h'F2 can reach to about 92.15% for all the autoscaled foF2. (Similar to previous studies (Jiang et al, ), an acceptable value is within ±25 km of the manual value for the height.) Table shows that the accuracy of the autoscaled h'F2 can increase to 95.75% for the acceptable value if ionograms with Es layer were removed (subset F).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…If the ionoScaler and operator did not have the same rule in identifying the F1 layer when the F1 layer develop not well, then it will cause a large error. (Jiang et al, 2013), an acceptable value is within ±25 km of the manual value for the height.) Table 3 shows that the accuracy of the autoscaled h'F2 can increase to 95.75% for the acceptable value if ionograms with Es layer were removed (subset F).…”
Section: Radio Sciencementioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common inversion algorithms include iteration algorithm (IA) [14], Genetic algorithm (GA) [15] and simulated annealing algorithm (SA) [16], etc. According to our previous study, HGA is better than GA and SA on optimizing ability and stability [12].…”
Section: The Process Of Path Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ding et al () presented a method to scale the F2‐layer parameters automatically on the basis of empirical orthogonal functions in combination with an image matching technique. Jiang et al (, ) presented a method to obtain the F2 parameters and F1 critical frequency by using the quasi‐parabolic segment model and empirical orthogonal functions. Harris et al () and Harris and Pederick () developed a new method to separate the O/X mode for vertical and oblique ionosonde based on direct digital receiver technology and algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%