2022
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3169325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ECG Signal Denoising Method Using Conditional Generative Adversarial Net

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 demonstrates that Cardio-NAFNet’s performance has a significant improvement in all noise combinations at all noise levels, resulting in a combined average difference of 11.76dB. In the supplement, we also provide results to compare the results with not only CGAN, but also with Improved denoising autoencoder[13], and adversarial method[21, 28, 29]. We note that while our model follows the general autoencoder architecture, the skip connections from the encoder to the decoder and utilizing NAFBlocks instead of ConvBlocks provide a significant improvement in results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 demonstrates that Cardio-NAFNet’s performance has a significant improvement in all noise combinations at all noise levels, resulting in a combined average difference of 11.76dB. In the supplement, we also provide results to compare the results with not only CGAN, but also with Improved denoising autoencoder[13], and adversarial method[21, 28, 29]. We note that while our model follows the general autoencoder architecture, the skip connections from the encoder to the decoder and utilizing NAFBlocks instead of ConvBlocks provide a significant improvement in results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first experiment, we created an identical environment to that of CAE-CGAN's experiment to provide a direct comparison of Cardio-NAFNet's performance to CAE-CGAN's performance [21]. Table 1 demonstrates that Cardio-NAFNet's performance has a significant improvement in all noise combinations at all noise levels, resulting in a combined average difference of 11.76dB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations