Previous studies of the growth of metropolitan communities, drawing primarily on ecological theory as represented by Burgess' concentric zone model of the metropolis, have highlighted the effects of distance from the city center on community develop ment. Using data from one major suburban region, we show that a more complete examination of Burgess' ecological life-cycle theory should deal also with the effects of initial development pattern, age of housing stock, minority and low-income presence, and social heterogeneity. In addition we argue that the latter three variables also can be interpreted as measures of the potential for collective action of residents to restrict development, and show that an explicitly political characteristic-incorporation-has a significant impact on one dimension of succession. We conclude that rather than limiting attention to the effects of distance (simplifying Burgess' model to central place theory), studies of growth should address more directly the interaction between ecological processes and the socio-political framework within which they operate.The theoretical basis of most sociological research on the growth and transformation of metropolitan communities is the ecological model represented in Burgess' concentric zone schema (Burgess, 1967). This body of research is subject to critique at two levels. First the literature's excessive emphasis on density gradients (or associations between community growth and distance from the central business district, as treated in Winsborough, 1962Winsborough, , 1963Berry, Simmons, and Tennant, 1963;Treadway, 1969) has provided an inadequate test of the ecological model. Second, by thinking of communities simply as locations organized according to the outcomes of infinite choices and confrontations by individual land users, ecological theory has neglected the impact on growth of collective community action (Molotch, 1976;Logan, 1978).We develop both lines of critique within the context of an exploration of the ecological, social structural, and political correlates of various types of growth in suburban communities. In the region studied we find that distance from the central city had no significant direct effect on growth and succession processes during the 1960s. Rather its influence was indirect, through its relationship with the age of community and the nature of development prior to 1960. Moreover we find that characteristics of local social and political structure which indicate both the desirability of places and the potential for collective action by residents are equally important determinants of growth. 01980 by The Sociological Quarterly. All rights reserved. 0038-0253/80/1600-0093$00.75