2007
DOI: 10.1075/cilt.284.09mad
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An economy approach to the triggering of the Russian instrumental predicate case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In finite clauses, the adjectival predicate can appear in short or long form (6a). Much debate continues to this day surrounding both the derivational and interpretational discrepancies of the two variants, and the source of the instrumental case marking of the long form (see Chvany 1975;Nichols 1981;Babby 1985;Franks 1995;Bailyn 2001;Madariaga 2007;Pereltsvaig 2007;Matushansky 2008Matushansky , 2010Grashchenkov 2018). Analytical passive constructions employ passive participles, which appear in the short form and can be interpreted as either dynamic or stative; the long form supports only the stative interpretation of the passive construction, or signals conversion of the passive participle into an adjective (6b In infinitival clauses, adjectival and passive predicates take different forms in subjectand object-control configurations.…”
Section: Infinitival Complementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In finite clauses, the adjectival predicate can appear in short or long form (6a). Much debate continues to this day surrounding both the derivational and interpretational discrepancies of the two variants, and the source of the instrumental case marking of the long form (see Chvany 1975;Nichols 1981;Babby 1985;Franks 1995;Bailyn 2001;Madariaga 2007;Pereltsvaig 2007;Matushansky 2008Matushansky , 2010Grashchenkov 2018). Analytical passive constructions employ passive participles, which appear in the short form and can be interpreted as either dynamic or stative; the long form supports only the stative interpretation of the passive construction, or signals conversion of the passive participle into an adjective (6b In infinitival clauses, adjectival and passive predicates take different forms in subjectand object-control configurations.…”
Section: Infinitival Complementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long form adjectives/passive participles in predicative position have a more articulated structure. We adopt the hypothesis argued for in Bailyn (2001Bailyn ( , 2012, Madariaga (2007), Matushansky (2008Matushansky ( , 2010, Grashchenkov (2018), which identifies instrumental case assignment in adjectival predicates with the functional head Pred (which take an adjectival/participial phrase as their complement) and introduces the subject DP as the external argument. We assume Graschchenkov's (2018) approach to long forms of adjectives (and participles) as involving an additional functional layer, adjP, which introduces the unvalued uninterpretable case feature into the adjectival/participial constituent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…и тв.п. в именном сказуемом[Nichols, 1981; Козинский, 1983;Franks, 1995;Bailyn, 2001;Filip, 2001; Strigin, Demjjanow, 2001;Grebenyova, 2005;Madariaga, 2007; Гращенков, 2018]. Для наших целей важно, что форма тв.…”
unclassified