2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An EEG-fNIRS hybridization technique in the four-class classification of alzheimer’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two scalp-located techniques could be used concurrently, providing a multimodal neuroimaging tool that is able to measure the electrical and associated hemodynamic brain activity [ 20 ]. Multimodal EEG-fNIRS has been already utilized to assess cortical connectivity alterations associated with AD [ 21 ] and to perform a data-driven identification of AD, obtaining superior performances with respect to those obtained with standalone systems [ 22 ]. Notably, probing both the electrical and hemodynamic brain activity, it is possible to have information about the functional hyperemia in response to brain activity (i.e., neurovascular coupling, NC), which is known to be dysregulated in AD [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two scalp-located techniques could be used concurrently, providing a multimodal neuroimaging tool that is able to measure the electrical and associated hemodynamic brain activity [ 20 ]. Multimodal EEG-fNIRS has been already utilized to assess cortical connectivity alterations associated with AD [ 21 ] and to perform a data-driven identification of AD, obtaining superior performances with respect to those obtained with standalone systems [ 22 ]. Notably, probing both the electrical and hemodynamic brain activity, it is possible to have information about the functional hyperemia in response to brain activity (i.e., neurovascular coupling, NC), which is known to be dysregulated in AD [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mCtCCA provided better classification accuracy in over 91.3% of considered subjects and increased performance by 1.8% on average (p < 0.001) than that of mCCCA as the correlation between the two data sets is likely to be highest with a temporal shift. The overall results demonstrated that the proposed approach provides a classification improvement over the existing methods of discriminating stress conditions in the workplace [26,65] as well as over recent studies that have combined EEG and fNIRS based on motor imagery tasks [67,68], Alzheimer's disease [69], and mental workload [70]. Therefore, the combination of EEG and fNIRS using the proposed approach (mCtCCA) has a significant impact on the better analysis of signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…There are several studies assessing EEG and fNIRS simultaneously to investigate whether the combination of electrophysiological and hemodynamic data enables a better understanding of brain activity and may reveal biomarkers for specific disorders. So far, findings are emerging 28 , 29 as correlations are found throughout several studies. For example, Sun et al investigated the neural correlates of automatic facial expressions when assessing EEG and fNIRS simultaneously 30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%