Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Com 2009
DOI: 10.3115/1620754.1620837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective discourse parser that uses rich linguistic information

Abstract: This paper presents a first-order logic learning approach to determine rhetorical relations between discourse segments. Beyond linguistic cues and lexical information, our approach exploits compositional semantics and segment discourse structure data. We report a statistically significant improvement in classifying relations over attribute-value learning paradigms such as Decision Trees, RIP-PER and Naive Bayes. For discourse parsing, our modified shift-reduce parsing model that uses our relation classifier si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…"but", "because", "after") and syntactic information (Le Thanh et al, 2004;Tofiloski et al, 2009 More recent discourse segmenters on the RST-DT are based on binary classifiers at the word level (Soricut and Marcu, 2003;Fisher and Roark, 2007;Joty et al, 2015), possibly using a neural network architecture (Subba and Di Eugenio, 2007). Joty et al (2015) also report results for the Instructional corpus (Subba and Di Eugenio, 2009) (F 1 80.9% on 10-fold).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…"but", "because", "after") and syntactic information (Le Thanh et al, 2004;Tofiloski et al, 2009 More recent discourse segmenters on the RST-DT are based on binary classifiers at the word level (Soricut and Marcu, 2003;Fisher and Roark, 2007;Joty et al, 2015), possibly using a neural network architecture (Subba and Di Eugenio, 2007). Joty et al (2015) also report results for the Instructional corpus (Subba and Di Eugenio, 2009) (F 1 80.9% on 10-fold).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…CKY and chart parsing) and various features (eg. length, position et al) for discourse parsing (Soricut and Marcu, 2003;Joty et al, 2012;Reitter, 2003;LeThanh et al, 2004;Baldridge and Lascarides, 2005;Subba and Di Eugenio, 2009;Sagae, 2009;Hernault et al, 2010b;Feng and Hirst, 2012). However, the existing approaches suffer from at least one of the following three problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldridge and Lascarides (2005) and Sagae (2009) used probabilistic head-driven parsing techniques. Subba and Di Eugenio (2009) were the first to incorporate rich compositional semantics into sentence-and document-level discourse parsing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%