2016
DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2016.1230953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective QR-based reduction algorithm for the fast estimation of GNSS high-dimensional ambiguity resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using more observations inevitably increases the AR dimension. As the number of AR dimensions increases, the difference in the size of the residual quadratic corresponding to the optimal candidate solution and the suboptimal candidate solution of ambiguity becomes less significant, and the ratio value gets close to 1.0, gradually [44]. Therefore, the commonly adopted empirical threshold of 3.0 is too strict for high-dimension AR, and it is easy to reject the ambiguity that can be fixed correctly.…”
Section: Data Processing Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using more observations inevitably increases the AR dimension. As the number of AR dimensions increases, the difference in the size of the residual quadratic corresponding to the optimal candidate solution and the suboptimal candidate solution of ambiguity becomes less significant, and the ratio value gets close to 1.0, gradually [44]. Therefore, the commonly adopted empirical threshold of 3.0 is too strict for high-dimension AR, and it is easy to reject the ambiguity that can be fixed correctly.…”
Section: Data Processing Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, too many satellites per epoch will jeopardize both fast ambiguity search and reliable ambiguity validation (Verhagen et al 2012). To be specific, the search for the integer candidates will slow down or even get stuck on the occasion of several tens of ambiguities injected simultaneously into LAMBDA (e.g., Jazaeri et al 2012;Lu et al 2018); even if smoothly through LAMBDA, the integer candidate validation for high-dimensional ambiguities through the ratio tests often malfunctions due to the hard choice of threshold values. Figure 10 shows the mean ratio values over the 31 days at all 107 stations against the number of resolved ambiguities.…”
Section: Instantaneous Ppp-war On a Mobile Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%