2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective strategy for distinguishing the processing degree of Polygonum multiflorum based on the analysis of substance and taste by LC-MS, ICP-OES and electronic tongue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pair of isomer compounds 25 and 32 both showed the deprotonated ions at m/z 577.1348 ([M − H] − , C 30 H 25 O 12 − ) and the fragment ions at m/z 425.0877, 451.1039 and 289.0717 generated through RDA fragment reaction, HRF fragmentation and QM cleavage, respectively ( Figure 4 A), which suggested that compounds 25 and 32 were the reported procyanidin B1/B2 [ 25 ]. Compounds 43 , 51 and 53 all produced the deprotonated ions at m/z 729.1458 (C 37 H 29 O 16 − ) and lost a galloyl group to generate the fragment ions at m/z 577.1352 (C 30 H 25 O 12 − ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pair of isomer compounds 25 and 32 both showed the deprotonated ions at m/z 577.1348 ([M − H] − , C 30 H 25 O 12 − ) and the fragment ions at m/z 425.0877, 451.1039 and 289.0717 generated through RDA fragment reaction, HRF fragmentation and QM cleavage, respectively ( Figure 4 A), which suggested that compounds 25 and 32 were the reported procyanidin B1/B2 [ 25 ]. Compounds 43 , 51 and 53 all produced the deprotonated ions at m/z 729.1458 (C 37 H 29 O 16 − ) and lost a galloyl group to generate the fragment ions at m/z 577.1352 (C 30 H 25 O 12 − ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the electronic nose has certain applicability in the differentiation of products. Xing et al (2021) distinguished the processing degree of Polygonum multiflorum using electronic tongue. In addition, some studies also showed that the electronic tongue technology can be applied to milk, meat and so on (Di Rosa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SA402B electronic tongue (Insent Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to evaluate the taste characteristics of different chicken food boluses formed during oral processing [36] . The instrument was equipped with 6 potential chemical film sensors (AAE stands for umami, CT0 for saltiness, CA0 for sourness, C00 for bitterness, AE1 for astringency and GL1 for sweetness).…”
Section: Electronic Tongue Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%