2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112000001944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective two-dimensional model for MHD flows with transverse magnetic field

Abstract: This paper presents a model for quasi two-dimensional MHD flows between two planes with small magnetic Reynolds number and constant transverse magnetic field orthogonal to the planes. A method is presented that allows to take 3D effects into account in a 2D equation of motion thanks to a model for the transverse velocity profile. The latter is obtained by using a double perturbation asymptotic development both in the core flow and in the Hartmann layers arising along the planes. A new model is thus built that … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
139
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(31 reference statements)
17
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same approach as per the development for expressions for a and x 0 for pure hydrodynamic flow, parameters b and c are derived from the peak vorticity time history of magnetohydrodynamic cases across 0.1 ≤ β ≤ 0.4, 500 ≤ H ≤ 5000, and 1500 ≤ Re L ≤ 8250, where a laminar periodic shedding regime is captured throughout this parameter range. The valid upper range of Re L is determined by both the assumptions of the SM82 model, i.e., the flow has sufficiently large perpendicular scales, in such a way that the condition of N ≫ (a/l ⊥ ) 3 and H ≫ (a/l ⊥ ) 2 is satisfied, 29,36 and the Hartmann layers must be laminar, i.e., the Reynolds number based on the Hartmann layer thickness Re/H < 250. 1 The former criterion is stricter than the latter, and by taking N > 10 as an indicative threshold for the applicable range of interaction parameters and H = 500, the model will break down at a Reynolds number of order Re L < H 2 /N = 500 2 /10 = 25 000, which is well above the maximum Re L studied, i.e., Re L = 8250.…”
Section: A Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the same approach as per the development for expressions for a and x 0 for pure hydrodynamic flow, parameters b and c are derived from the peak vorticity time history of magnetohydrodynamic cases across 0.1 ≤ β ≤ 0.4, 500 ≤ H ≤ 5000, and 1500 ≤ Re L ≤ 8250, where a laminar periodic shedding regime is captured throughout this parameter range. The valid upper range of Re L is determined by both the assumptions of the SM82 model, i.e., the flow has sufficiently large perpendicular scales, in such a way that the condition of N ≫ (a/l ⊥ ) 3 and H ≫ (a/l ⊥ ) 2 is satisfied, 29,36 and the Hartmann layers must be laminar, i.e., the Reynolds number based on the Hartmann layer thickness Re/H < 250. 1 The former criterion is stricter than the latter, and by taking N > 10 as an indicative threshold for the applicable range of interaction parameters and H = 500, the model will break down at a Reynolds number of order Re L < H 2 /N = 500 2 /10 = 25 000, which is well above the maximum Re L studied, i.e., Re L = 8250.…”
Section: A Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,57 As a result, the SM82 model breaks down locally when the effect of viscosity is relevant, i.e., when Ha ∼ l ∥ /l ⊥ , or when the transverse length scale l ⊥ is of the order of the Shercliff layers thickness, δ S = aHa −1/2 . Despite the inherent limitations of the SM82 model, it has nevertheless been shown to predict the Shercliff layers thickness and an isolated vortex profile to high accuracy when compared to 3D solutions, 36 where the reported errors are less than 10%. 29,38 The model has also been tested for flows in a duct with a cylinder obstacle, where the critical Reynolds number at the onset of vortex shedding in Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivation of the complete form of the vorticity transport equation would, however, require the introduction of terms proportional to z 4 in the basic expression (10) for the electric potential. Such a model, would be a generalization of the approach presented in [34], allowing for high ε values. Notice that in the particular case B = B(x), equation (35) can also be interpreted as an expression for the axial part of the current density component j 0x (x, y, z = 0) = -σ (∂ x 0 -Bv 0 ), parallel to ∇ ⊥ B, which is expressed through other unknowns (velocity and vorticity).…”
Section: Equation Of Vorticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Models of Q2D flows have been developed for the flow between parallel planes in a uniform magnetic field, 27,28 a nonuniform magnetic field, 29,30 or buoyant convection in a uniform field. 7,8,11,12 More elaborate Q2D models have been developed by Pothérat et al, 31,32 which take into account small but finite Ekman pumping in the Hartmann layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%