2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient AES implementation using FPGA with enhanced security features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In XC6VLX240T device, the proposed LAES improved the throughput by 202.98% and 65.11% compared to [24] and [30] respectively. Although the throughput in [25] is higher by 3.94%, the proposed LAES is better in terms of performance efficiency by 361.3% and has a lesser in area utilization by 79.05%. The throughput in [25] is higher using XC6SLX150 but in terms of area and performance efficiency, the proposed LAES is better by 84.42% and 444.53% respectively.…”
Section: Data Collection Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In XC6VLX240T device, the proposed LAES improved the throughput by 202.98% and 65.11% compared to [24] and [30] respectively. Although the throughput in [25] is higher by 3.94%, the proposed LAES is better in terms of performance efficiency by 361.3% and has a lesser in area utilization by 79.05%. The throughput in [25] is higher using XC6SLX150 but in terms of area and performance efficiency, the proposed LAES is better by 84.42% and 444.53% respectively.…”
Section: Data Collection Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although the throughput in [25] is higher by 3.94%, the proposed LAES is better in terms of performance efficiency by 361.3% and has a lesser in area utilization by 79.05%. The throughput in [25] is higher using XC6SLX150 but in terms of area and performance efficiency, the proposed LAES is better by 84.42% and 444.53% respectively. In XC4VLX60 device, there is an increase in throughput by 42.28% and 6.97% compared to [30] and [25] respectively.…”
Section: Data Collection Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations