2015
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Boundary Handling with a Modified Density Calculation for SPH

Abstract: We propose a new boundary handling method for smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Previous approaches required the use of boundary particles to prevent particles from sticking to the boundary. We address this issue by correcting the fundamental equations of SPH with the integration of a kernel function. Our approach is able to directly handle triangle mesh boundaries without the need for boundary particles. We also show how our approach can be integrated into a position-based fluid framework.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= 967 / 3 = 3079 / 3 = 7008 / 3 = 988 / 3 = 952 / 3 = 954 / 3 ℎ = 1.5 ( )ℎ = 2 ℎ = 2.5 Figure 10: A comparison between our method (bottom) and Fujisawa and Miura [FM15](top). By assuming the rest density to be 1000kg/m 3 , we calculate the average density for the one layer of particles that are closest to the boundary.…”
Section: Position-based Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…= 967 / 3 = 3079 / 3 = 7008 / 3 = 988 / 3 = 952 / 3 = 954 / 3 ℎ = 1.5 ( )ℎ = 2 ℎ = 2.5 Figure 10: A comparison between our method (bottom) and Fujisawa and Miura [FM15](top). By assuming the rest density to be 1000kg/m 3 , we calculate the average density for the one layer of particles that are closest to the boundary.…”
Section: Position-based Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the one using a signed distance field, our method only introduces 26% additional computational cost while the simulation with ghost particles introduce 52%. In addition, Figure 10 shows a comparison between our method and the one proposed by Fujisawa and Miura [FM15] in calculating the density for particles near the boundary. Note the unsatisfactory results Fujisawa and Miura's method gets when a large kernel size is set for the density calculation.…”
Section: Position-based Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation of a SPH fluid always shows artifacts at the boundary. Therefore, many boundary handling techniques [26,27] for SPH-based fluid simulations have been proposed. The blood vessel is an elastic object and its deformation is influenced by the heart beat and movements of nearby tissues.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar gradient correction terms for weakly compressible fluids were introduced by Ferrand et al [2013] for two-dimensional and by Mayrhofer et al [2011] for three-dimensional domains. The renormalization approach was later adopted by Fujisawa and Miura [2015] in the field of computer graphics. They represent boundaries using triangular meshes and compute the renormalization factors during runtime.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%