2019
DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient hybrid similarity measure based on user interests for recommender systems

Abstract: Recommender systems are used to suggest items to users based on their interests. They have been used widely in various domains, including online stores, web advertisements, and social networks. As part of their process, recommender systems use a set of similarity measurements that would assist in finding interesting items. Although many similarity measurements have been proposed in the literature, they have not concentrated on actual user interests. This paper proposes a new efficient hybrid similarity measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early approaches in recommender systems were based on the popular content‐based filtering (CBF) algorithms. These algorithms model user profiles by associating their preferences with the item content (Degemmis, Lops, & Semeraro, 2007; Eirinaki, Vazirgiannis, & Varlamis, 2003; Hawashin, Lafi, Kanan, & Mansour, 2019; Jannach et al, 2010; Magnini & Strapparava, 2001; Martins, Belém, Almeida, & Gonçalves, 2016; Renckes, Polat, & Oysal, 2012). The user preferences can be of different forms, for example, ratings or interactions, and can be elicited explicitly (Billsus & Pazzani, 1999), or implicitly (Kelly & Teevan, 2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early approaches in recommender systems were based on the popular content‐based filtering (CBF) algorithms. These algorithms model user profiles by associating their preferences with the item content (Degemmis, Lops, & Semeraro, 2007; Eirinaki, Vazirgiannis, & Varlamis, 2003; Hawashin, Lafi, Kanan, & Mansour, 2019; Jannach et al, 2010; Magnini & Strapparava, 2001; Martins, Belém, Almeida, & Gonçalves, 2016; Renckes, Polat, & Oysal, 2012). The user preferences can be of different forms, for example, ratings or interactions, and can be elicited explicitly (Billsus & Pazzani, 1999), or implicitly (Kelly & Teevan, 2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TF-IDF also used for several recommender system [10,11,12,13,14]. One research also propose a recommendation system for academic collaboration in undergraduate research [15] based on the undergraduates' profiles and incorporates rule-based filtering techniques. A decision support system by applying the simple additive weighting method proposed by Pristiwanto [16] for the determination of the final assignment supervisor also provides similar aim.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reveal that although this method did not increase the global coverage, it improved the predictions of already covered items, alleviating some of the drawbacks of the sparsity problem. Hawashin et al [38] proposed a hybrid similarity measure based on explicit user interests; the proposed method achieved good performance even when no co-rated items existed between two users. However, it did not consider the semantic meanings of the ratings, and it depended on the existence and quality of explicit user interests.…”
Section: Sparsity In Neighborhood-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%