New Approaches in Engineering Research Vol. 10 2021
DOI: 10.9734/bpi/naer/v10/11914d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Dyslexia from Eye Fixation Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The text was written in the subjects' native language, Serbian, which has a perfect matching between letters and phonemes. Considering dyslexia detection in such languages (the ones with a shallow orthographic system) is often quite difficult; an accuracy of 94% achieved on the balanced dataset used in this paper (F1 score 0.93 and AUROC 0.96) (Table 2) shows a promising result that is comparable to the ones achieved in the literature [29,30,32,33,[35][36][37][39][40][41] which were performed on languages with deeper orthographic systems. As the Serbian language has a shallow orthographic system, making dyslexia harder to diagnose, we consider the observed subject pool relevant for the performed research purposes for a language such as Serbian.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The text was written in the subjects' native language, Serbian, which has a perfect matching between letters and phonemes. Considering dyslexia detection in such languages (the ones with a shallow orthographic system) is often quite difficult; an accuracy of 94% achieved on the balanced dataset used in this paper (F1 score 0.93 and AUROC 0.96) (Table 2) shows a promising result that is comparable to the ones achieved in the literature [29,30,32,33,[35][36][37][39][40][41] which were performed on languages with deeper orthographic systems. As the Serbian language has a shallow orthographic system, making dyslexia harder to diagnose, we consider the observed subject pool relevant for the performed research purposes for a language such as Serbian.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…They also observed features extracted from both saccades and fixations and obtained an accuracy of 95.6% with the hybrid SVM-PSO model. Prabha et al also focused on observing eye-tracking feature sets and several other ML algorithms in their work performed on the same dataset [34,35], obtaining similar results, although a slightly higher accuracy of 96% in [35] using a hybrid SVM-PSO model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors implanted an RFE feature selection algorithm and several different machine learning (ML) algorithms, including SVM, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forest (RF). They obtained an accuracy of 95% and continued their work through several other publications, analyzing the same dataset [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. They tried different ML algorithms and eye-tracking feature inputs, obtaining a slightly higher accuracy of 96% in [ 36 ], and providing a method for clustering the dyslexic group into high and low dyslexics, providing reference ranges for fixation and saccade duration to estimate the severity of dyslexia [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%