2007
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method for the detection and elimination of systematic error in high-throughput screening

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although diverse in silico methods have been proposed to identify hits (Makarenkov et al, 2007;Malo et al, 2006) and predict targets for chemicals [reviewed in (Kuhn et al, 2008)], only few of them are available as easy-to-use online tools (Keiser et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2012). To overcome this situation and assist in the analysis and interpretation of chemical phenotypic screens, we introduce HitPick, the first web server for hit identification and target prediction of chemical screenings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although diverse in silico methods have been proposed to identify hits (Makarenkov et al, 2007;Malo et al, 2006) and predict targets for chemicals [reviewed in (Kuhn et al, 2008)], only few of them are available as easy-to-use online tools (Keiser et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2012). To overcome this situation and assist in the analysis and interpretation of chemical phenotypic screens, we introduce HitPick, the first web server for hit identification and target prediction of chemical screenings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only plate-specific bias is addressed by commonly used normalization methods such as Z-scores or methods which use internal controls (e.g., percentage inhibition or activation, percentage of control, and plate-median normalization). More recent methods have been developed that simultaneously address all three types of bias [1][2][3][4][5] with additional performance improvements provided by randomized study designs. 4 Current normalization methods take advantage of the fact that most primary-screen features (e.g., compounds and small interfering RNAs [siRNAs]) within each plate are inactive, which permits using robust estimates of row and column effects to remove systematic error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the behavior could be parametrized using a technique derived from statistical moments. Systemic errors become more noticeable as they create border effects, which are systematically over-or underestimated [24]. The basic preprocessing steps are usually baseline removal and data smoothing [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%