2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient optimization process for hydrocarbon production in presence of geological uncertainty using a clustering method: A case study on Brugge field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a deviation method of semi-variance was included in geological and economical uncertainty defined by a set of geological system realizations and a set of different oil price scenarios to optimize the worst cases [17,19]. Foroud, et al, andSiraj, et al (2016, 2017) stressed the geological system as a primary cause of uncertainty in the simulation of petroleum reservoirs that can lower the reliability of optimization process outcomes of simulation. The clustering algorithms such as the Kernel K-means Method (KKM) were suggested to pick a generic subset of geological systems and reduce the overall calculation cost during the process of simulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a deviation method of semi-variance was included in geological and economical uncertainty defined by a set of geological system realizations and a set of different oil price scenarios to optimize the worst cases [17,19]. Foroud, et al, andSiraj, et al (2016, 2017) stressed the geological system as a primary cause of uncertainty in the simulation of petroleum reservoirs that can lower the reliability of optimization process outcomes of simulation. The clustering algorithms such as the Kernel K-means Method (KKM) were suggested to pick a generic subset of geological systems and reduce the overall calculation cost during the process of simulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K-Means involved in this data preprocessing stage by reducing the large number of data, and categorizing them into clusters. Foroud et al studied on production optimization under the state of geological uncertainty (14). The geological model was identified as the main source of uncertainty that diminished the viability of simulation results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of machine learning method (Bao & Guan, 2016) No Oil production prediction K-Meansdata discretion (Foroud, et al, 2016) No Optimize production by looking at geological models K-Meansdata discretion (Awoleke & Lane, 2011) No Well water production prediction SOMsee how data are clustered K-Meansdetermine number of clusters Neural Networkprediction (Hu, et al, 2015) No Oil production prediction K-Meansdata discretion (G. (Popa, et al, 2015) No Perforation strategy optimization C-Meanscluster log data (Grieser, et al, 2008) No Overall well investigation SOMdata clustering (Cremaschi, et al, 2015) No Flow velocity estimation in pipelines K-Meansdata clustering (Shin & Cremaschi, 2014) No Flow velocity estimation in pipelines K-Meansdata clustering (Ding, et al, 2015) No Investigate high-permeability zone C-Meansdata clustering (Cui, et al, 2016) No Oil recovery improvement for high water-cut reservoirs K-Meanscluster/group the subjects (Liu, et al, 2009) No Measurement of water content in crude oil K-Meansdata preprocessing for prediction (Singh, et al, 2014) No Measurement for forecasted oil recovery K-Meansdata discretion…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization under geological uncertainties have been proposed in several studies (Dang et al, 2016;Foroud et al, 2016;Nguyen et al, 2016;Nwachukwu et al, 2018;Welkenhuysen et al, 2017). However, these studies emphasize on optimizing oil production performance rather than CO2 sequestration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%