2013 IEEE 8th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iciea.2013.6566630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient reliability estimation technique for audio-visual person identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature-level is not preferable since most vendors of biometric systems do not like to reveal the feature values obtained from their systems [8]. Rank-level fusion has not drawn much interest, since it is only applicable for identification of an user [5]. Amongst the five level of fusions, score-level is preferable since the matching scores obtained from multiple matchers are easy to access and easy to combine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Feature-level is not preferable since most vendors of biometric systems do not like to reveal the feature values obtained from their systems [8]. Rank-level fusion has not drawn much interest, since it is only applicable for identification of an user [5]. Amongst the five level of fusions, score-level is preferable since the matching scores obtained from multiple matchers are easy to access and easy to combine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…And, such type of weighting techniques have limitations in the situations where there is no prior information of the genuine/impostor score distributions. Authors in [5] have proposed a technique to estimate the reliabilities of audio and video modalities from the ratio of the mean of top k ranked scores to the mean of the score distribution. The reliabilities of different modalities measured in [5] are mapped to modality weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations