2020
DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.13604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient tea quality classification algorithm based on near infrared spectroscopy and random Forest

Abstract: Traditional tea quality evaluation methods are based on chemical testing, such as gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GCMS) and high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). However, the process of extracting chemical components is generally time‐consuming and expensive, which makes it unsuitable for wide range of applications. Therefore, this paper presents a new approach to evaluate tea quality based on Near‐infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) devices. In our method, factor analysis compression algorithm is firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the performance of the proposed ITWSVM model with other state-of-the-art models in DSP toxins detection, we have conducted experiments under various IR. Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) (Murlidhar et al, 2021), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) (Zhao et al, 2022), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) (Liu, 2010), random forest (RF) (Chen et al, 2021), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) (Wang et al, 2021) models have been selected for comparison.…”
Section: Comparison Of Detection Performance For Dsp Toxins-contamina...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance of the proposed ITWSVM model with other state-of-the-art models in DSP toxins detection, we have conducted experiments under various IR. Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) (Murlidhar et al, 2021), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) (Zhao et al, 2022), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) (Liu, 2010), random forest (RF) (Chen et al, 2021), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) (Wang et al, 2021) models have been selected for comparison.…”
Section: Comparison Of Detection Performance For Dsp Toxins-contamina...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, this process is time-consuming and expensive, which prevent its use by customers. Methods e.g., Vis-NIR spectroscopy [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ], Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy [ 11 , 12 ], laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [ 13 ], chemical analysis [ 14 ], X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy [ 15 ], electronic nose [ 16 ], and liquid chromatography [ 17 ] have all been applied to tea classification. Although the classification abilities of these methods are good, drawbacks of high costs and large volumes of the experimental systems limit their utilization to laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Liu et al (2020) used competitive adaptive reweighting algorithms‐stepwise regression analysis combined with NIR spectroscopy to classify five kinds of Chinese tea and achieved satisfactory results. Hazarika et al (2018) developed a set of tea NIR detection devices, which realizes the functions of fixing, drying, grinding, weighing, and detection; Chen et al (2021) established a tea quality evaluation system with superior performance using NIR spectroscopy and random forest algorithm and realized the accurate classification of tea quality. NIR spectroscopy combined with the support vector data description algorithm successfully identified black tea from four countries (Ning et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%