“…The proposed SabGAN-AqOA-EgAwR-WSN model provide 20.92%, 21.01%, 19.32%, 18.32%, 20.04%, 19.43%, 20.43%, 18.56%, 20.84%, 17.06%, 16.34%, and 15.40% lower delay compared with existing methods like Kavitha and Ganapathy, 13 Gulganwa and Jain, 8 William et al, 35 Srividya and Devi, 33 Mukherjee et al, 24 Mukherjee et al, 23 Mukherjee et al, 22 Jain et al, 11 Verma and Jha, 34 Sindhuja et al, 32 Saranraj et al, 30 and Mehta and Saxena, 20 respectively. The proposed SabGAN-AqOA-EgAwR-WSN model provide 22.02%, 21.81%, 20.62%, 19.72%, 20.04%, 17.43%, 19.03%, 18.26%, 19.04%, 17.96%, 16.14%, and 14.70% lower energy consumption compared with existing methods like Kavitha and Ganapathy, 13 Gulganwa and Jain, 8 William et al, 35 Srividya and Devi, 33 Mukherjee et al, 24 Mukherjee et al, 23 Mukherjee et al, 22 Jain et al, 11 Verma and Jha, 34 Sindhuja et al, 32 delivery ratio compared with existing methods like Kavitha and Ganapathy, 13 Gulganwa and Jain, 8 William et al, 35 Srividya and Devi, 33 Mukherjee et al, 24 Mukherjee et al, 23 Mukherjee et al, 22 Jain et al, 11 Verma and Jha, 34 Sindhuja et al, 32 Saranraj et al, 30 and Mehta and Saxena, 20 respectively. The proposed SabGAN-AqOA-EgAwR-WSN model provides 13.07%, 14.36%, 16.67%, 12.45%, 14.87%, 17.43%, 19.34%, 20.75%, 22.74%, 21.75%, 20.65%, and 24.32% higher network lifetime compared with existing methods like Kavitha and Ganapathy, 13 Gulganwa and Jain, 8 William et al,…”