2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/robosoft54090.2022.9762196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Electromagnetic Soft Robot that Carries its Own Magnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core comprises a soft, conducting strain‐sensing foam, and the whole device is encapsulated with an outer soft, insulating CNF foam. There are previous reports on single‐coil actuators; [ 17–20,23,25,26,28 ] however, such designs exhibit a fast decrease in force with increasing coil distance from the magnet, resulting in a short effective stroke length (Figure 1d). We hypothesized that by increasing the number of coils, the effective stroke length could be increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The core comprises a soft, conducting strain‐sensing foam, and the whole device is encapsulated with an outer soft, insulating CNF foam. There are previous reports on single‐coil actuators; [ 17–20,23,25,26,28 ] however, such designs exhibit a fast decrease in force with increasing coil distance from the magnet, resulting in a short effective stroke length (Figure 1d). We hypothesized that by increasing the number of coils, the effective stroke length could be increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[5] Actuation is one of the most challenging aspects of soft robotics, and a variety of approaches have been explored, including pressure-driven actuation, [6,7] thermal actuation, [8,9] humiditydriven actuation, [10][11][12][13] dielectric elastomer actuation, [14][15][16] and electromagnetic actuation. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Pressure-driven actuators can generate large forces and deformations but have slow response and require relatively high-pressure equipment to function. [6,7] Thermal actuators can generate large deformations and forces, but are hard to control, slow in response time, and require relatively high temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison between the presented MSMs (lifting and radial linear motion) and other types of artificial muscles and near‐field magnetic actuators is shown in Table S1 (Supporting Information). [ 44 , 64 , 65 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, electromagnetic near‐field sources generate time‐varying fields. For example, copper solenoid arrays control planar motion of ferrofluidic robots, [ 63 ] liquid metal‐based solenoids exert linear forces on a permanent magnetic core for biomimicry [ 64 ] and push and pull permanent magnets as part of a soft gripper. [ 65 ] Also, printed circuit board‐based coil arrays control diamagnetically levitating permanent magnets, [ 66 , 67 ] , direct sliding motion of disk‐shaped permanent magnets [ 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ] , and control the position of superparamagnetic nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%