2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electronic learning portfolio for reflective continuing professional development

Abstract: There was considerable support for reflective learning using an electronic portfolio. Acceptability and use were influenced by individual learning style, resources, training and technical support, and these were often inadequate. The balance for consultants between workload demands and support provided did not favour a reflective type of learning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Equally, Template Analysis does not insist on an explicit distinction between descriptive and interpretive themes, nor on a particular position for each type of theme in the coding structure. The data involved in Template Analysis studies are usually interview transcripts (e.g., Goldschmidt et al 2006;Lockett et al 2012;Slade, Haywood & King 2009;Thompson et al 2010) but may be any kind of textual data, including focus groups (e.g., Kirkby-Geddes, Brooks 2014), diary entries (e.g., Waddington & Fletcher 2005), and open-ended question responses on a written questionnaire (e.g., Dornan, Carroll & Parboosingh 2002;Kent 2000). The main procedural steps in carrying out Template Analysis are outlined below (these are described in more detail in King 2012).…”
Section: What Is Template Analysis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally, Template Analysis does not insist on an explicit distinction between descriptive and interpretive themes, nor on a particular position for each type of theme in the coding structure. The data involved in Template Analysis studies are usually interview transcripts (e.g., Goldschmidt et al 2006;Lockett et al 2012;Slade, Haywood & King 2009;Thompson et al 2010) but may be any kind of textual data, including focus groups (e.g., Kirkby-Geddes, Brooks 2014), diary entries (e.g., Waddington & Fletcher 2005), and open-ended question responses on a written questionnaire (e.g., Dornan, Carroll & Parboosingh 2002;Kent 2000). The main procedural steps in carrying out Template Analysis are outlined below (these are described in more detail in King 2012).…”
Section: What Is Template Analysis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our results demonstrate, the trainers also struggle with time constraints, with 70% claiming diffi culties in fi tting the required amount of assessments for their trainees into their daily clinical schedule, a fi nding supported by other groups. 15,16 Workplace-based assessments: do they work?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beaucoup d'auteurs [8,[25][26][27][28][29] considèrent le temps comme un facteur ayant une influence négative sur l'utilisation de portfolios par les professionnels de santé, qui éprouvent des difficultés à ajouter l'élabo-ration d'un portfolio dans un emploi du temps déjà chargé. Kjaer et al [12] doutent de la possibilité d'inté-grer 10 à 15 minutes de temps alloué protégé supplé-mentaire dans le cadre du dispositif de rencontre formateur/stagiaire déjà en place.…”
Section: Tempsunclassified