1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-9351(87)80199-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An emphysema model in rats treated intratracheally with elastase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the present study, an increase in lung volume has been reported in living animals treated with intratracheal elastase (Kaplan et al 1973;Hayes et al 1975;Snider and Sherter 1977;Harkema 1984;Yokoyama et al 1987). However, when elastase was instilled intratracheally to excised lungs no increase in TLC was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As in the present study, an increase in lung volume has been reported in living animals treated with intratracheal elastase (Kaplan et al 1973;Hayes et al 1975;Snider and Sherter 1977;Harkema 1984;Yokoyama et al 1987). However, when elastase was instilled intratracheally to excised lungs no increase in TLC was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Unlike Damon et al [18], we also observed increases in residual volume and total lung capacity. These changes in lung structure and pulmonary function are often seen in patients with COPD [ 10, 21-23] and are in agreement with a variety of animal studies utilizing lung elastase treatment to model emphysema [ 19,20,24]. Using the methods of Damon et al…”
Section: Effect Of Elastase On Lung Structure and Pulmonary Functionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The increased mean ADC at EEV in the elastase group as compared with the saline group implies that the distal air space volume is larger in the elastase group. This increase is anticipated in the emphysema model, because the EEV increases because of decreased elastic recoil (18,19). It is difficult to comment on the lack of significant difference between the HB diffusion coefficients for both groups of animals because we used a pressure ventilator, which does not guarantee an equal tidal volume delivered to both sets of animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%