2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00272.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical analysis of district external economies based on a structure-conduct-performance framework

Abstract: Since its appearance, the concept of the Marshallian industrial district has attracted growing interest which has manifested itself in a large body of theoretical literature. However, empirical research with statistical methods applied to the inner working and performance of districts is scarce, probably due to the difficulty associated with the measuring of some of their intrinsic elements. The aim of this paper is to show the feasibility of empirically testing the internal dynamics of the Marshallian industr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a complexity does not make it easier for the decision makers implementing unitary policies on an urban-scale to trigger both social and external effects, such as variety and scale economies [45] and economies that are partly external to each urban unit (building or block) but internal to the neighborhood [46], in typical organization and specialization economies [47].…”
Section: The House-city-landscape System From a Green Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a complexity does not make it easier for the decision makers implementing unitary policies on an urban-scale to trigger both social and external effects, such as variety and scale economies [45] and economies that are partly external to each urban unit (building or block) but internal to the neighborhood [46], in typical organization and specialization economies [47].…”
Section: The House-city-landscape System From a Green Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Muro et al (2011) criticize the use of PCA for building composite indicators because weights are based on a 'pure' statistical technique and may not reflect the relevance of single variables in the underlying phenomenon. However, weights from PCA may be less 'subjective' because these are data driven and not assigned by the researcher, in contrast to the case of the 'normative' weights (Bellandi & Ruiz-Fuensanta, 2010).…”
Section: Composite Indicators and Principal Component Analysis For Geographical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%