2017
DOI: 10.1177/1745790417729313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical analysis of the public’s attitudes toward advertising chiropractic services: A comparative cross-sectional study

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate current attitudes and opinions about chiropractors' advertising and to compare them to the attitudes expressed eight years ago. This study was designed to determine (a) consumers' attitudes toward advertising by chiropractors, (b) which media consumers feel are appropriate for chiropractors' advertising, (c) whether consumers are seeing chiropractors' advertising, and (d) if so, through which media. It replicates a survey conducted in 2008 and uses a very similar que… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given these caveats, the following list offers several recommendations from our findings that are at least worthy of future inquiry for investors, patients, physicians, hospital suppliers, philanthropists, insurance companies, Medicare, policy makers, and regulators. Hospital vendors offering cutting-edge medical devices and pharmaceutical firms launching innovative drugs might focus on nonprofits. A hospital’s expansion of PSMS potentially facilitates donations by providing direct opportunities for naming rights and associated benefits. Thus, nonprofits might favor tangible growth (e.g., buildings) over intellectual capital growth. Insurers should consider that more competitive markets might require greater reimbursements for nonprofit medical services. The need to reach larger geographic target markets may explain nonprofit hospitals’ advertising, suggesting an alternative to popular views that advertising is wasteful and self-serving (Moser and Freeman 2014). Although patients often visit hospitals for specific procedures, they might benefit from having broader nonprofit PSMS available in the event of possible unexpected diagnoses or complications. Having more PSMS can create a competitive advantage because PSMS staff can perform non-PSMS functions when necessary, but the reverse is seldom true. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, given these caveats, the following list offers several recommendations from our findings that are at least worthy of future inquiry for investors, patients, physicians, hospital suppliers, philanthropists, insurance companies, Medicare, policy makers, and regulators. Hospital vendors offering cutting-edge medical devices and pharmaceutical firms launching innovative drugs might focus on nonprofits. A hospital’s expansion of PSMS potentially facilitates donations by providing direct opportunities for naming rights and associated benefits. Thus, nonprofits might favor tangible growth (e.g., buildings) over intellectual capital growth. Insurers should consider that more competitive markets might require greater reimbursements for nonprofit medical services. The need to reach larger geographic target markets may explain nonprofit hospitals’ advertising, suggesting an alternative to popular views that advertising is wasteful and self-serving (Moser and Freeman 2014). Although patients often visit hospitals for specific procedures, they might benefit from having broader nonprofit PSMS available in the event of possible unexpected diagnoses or complications. Having more PSMS can create a competitive advantage because PSMS staff can perform non-PSMS functions when necessary, but the reverse is seldom true. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to reach larger geographic target markets may explain nonprofit hospitals’ advertising, suggesting an alternative to popular views that advertising is wasteful and self-serving (Moser and Freeman 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%