2020
DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical example of analysis using a two-stage modeling approach: within-subject association of outdoor context and physical activity predicts future daily physical activity levels

Abstract: People differ from each other to the extent to which momentary factors, such as context, mood, and cognitions, influence momentary health behaviors. However, statistical models to date are limited in their ability to test whether the association between two momentary variables (i.e., subject-level slopes) predicts a subject-level outcome. This study demonstrates a novel two-stage statistical modeling strategy that is capable of testing whether subject-level slopes between two momentary variables predict subjec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were eligible for the TIME Study main trial if they (1) owned an Android smartphone running Android version ≥6.0 as their only personal mobile phone with no intention to switch to a non-Android smartphone, (2) did not wear a smartwatch already, (3) were aged 18-29 years and living in the United States, (4) were currently engaged in recommended levels of PA (or intended to within the next 12 months) [55], (5) spoke and read English, (6) resided in an area with Wi-Fi connectivity, (7) did not have any physical or cognitive limitations that prevented participation, and (8) were able wear a smartwatch and answer real-time smartphone and smartwatch surveys. All study procedures were approved by the institutional review board at the University of Southern California (USC; HS-18-00605).…”
Section: Time Study Main Trial Participants and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants were eligible for the TIME Study main trial if they (1) owned an Android smartphone running Android version ≥6.0 as their only personal mobile phone with no intention to switch to a non-Android smartphone, (2) did not wear a smartwatch already, (3) were aged 18-29 years and living in the United States, (4) were currently engaged in recommended levels of PA (or intended to within the next 12 months) [55], (5) spoke and read English, (6) resided in an area with Wi-Fi connectivity, (7) did not have any physical or cognitive limitations that prevented participation, and (8) were able wear a smartwatch and answer real-time smartphone and smartwatch surveys. All study procedures were approved by the institutional review board at the University of Southern California (USC; HS-18-00605).…”
Section: Time Study Main Trial Participants and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State or behavior assessment and personalized interventions both require computational models that can represent the interrelationships between different behaviors and states unique to individuals. Such models could be created by using (1) a hypothetico-deductive approach to study relationships between predictors and outcomes of interest based on prior knowledge [6,7], (2) data-driven discovery from a large number of constructs measured in intensive longitudinal data (ILD) studies [8,9], or (3) an appropriate combination of both [10,11]. Creating models of behavior that capture relationships between behavior and context that can happen quickly and many times in a day requires methods for sustainable data gathering on, and modeling of, within-day changes of variables (eg, physical activity [PA], sleep, sedentary behavior [SB], and affect) [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weather conditions might not only influence individuals' immediate decisions regarding PA but also might act as a potential moderator in the overall affective states and PB relationship. Several contextual factors such as natural, built, or social environments that may influence the time-dynamic, within-subject affect-behavior relationship have been investigated [27][28][29]. Self-perceived weather, such as too rainy, was shown to have a negative effect on affect, or perceived too cold weather reduced positive affect [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State or behavior assessment and personalized interventions both require computational models that can represent the interrelationships between different behaviors and states unique to individuals. Such models could be created by using (1) a hypothetico-deductive approach to study relationships between predictors and outcomes of interest based on prior knowledge [ 6 , 7 ], (2) data-driven discovery from a large number of constructs measured in intensive longitudinal data (ILD) studies [ 8 , 9 ], or (3) an appropriate combination of both [ 10 , 11 ]. Creating models of behavior that capture relationships between behavior and context that can happen quickly and many times in a day requires methods for sustainable data gathering on, and modeling of, within-day changes of variables (eg, physical activity [PA], sleep, sedentary behavior [SB], and affect) [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%