1985
DOI: 10.1086/190995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical H-gamma luminosity calibration for class V-III stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective temperature ( T eff ) and absolute magnitude ( M V ) of each star were assigned using tabulated scales from the compilation of Straizys & Kuriliene (1981). A good agreement was found between the adopted M V values and the absolute magnitudes derived using the empirical H γ – M V calibration from Millward & Walker (1985). We constructed the SED of the target stars (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective temperature ( T eff ) and absolute magnitude ( M V ) of each star were assigned using tabulated scales from the compilation of Straizys & Kuriliene (1981). A good agreement was found between the adopted M V values and the absolute magnitudes derived using the empirical H γ – M V calibration from Millward & Walker (1985). We constructed the SED of the target stars (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the details of their parameter search strategy are unfortunately not described in Peterson et al (2006), we focus here on Aufdenberg et al's (2006) study. In our opinion, a critical assumption they made is that the apparent bolometric luminosity of Vega (57 L ) is nothing but superficial (due to a view-angle-dependent effect in a gravity-darkened poleon rapid rotator), while its true luminosity should be 37.7 L (which they considered typical for a slowly rotating A0 V star according to Millward & Walker 1985). With this presupposition, Vega must rotate very fast in order to make the temperature (or the brightness) near the pole high enough to produce such a large apparent excess in the luminosity.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frankly speaking, their approach for seeking solutions seems rather questionable, because their fundamental assumption that Vega should have a true luminosity of 37.7 L is not convincing. That is, the M V data they quote from Millward & Walker (1985) is an averaged value for A0 V stars in general, which are actually an assembly of stars with a rather large diversity of stellar parameters (mass, age, metallicity, etc. ), because of inevitable uncertainties involved in the spectral classification.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have included data for OB stars in the larger environs of the Cepheid, with the UBV data for these stars taken from Klare & Neckel ( 1977) and Schild, Garrison & Hiltner ( 1983). Absolute magnitudes M v for these stars were derived as in Turner ( 1986 ) by using Klare & Neckel's Hß indices with the W( H7 ) calibration of Millward & Walker (1985), and by adjusting the final values for rotational effects assuming V sin i values for each star typical of the average for the star's spectral type (Fukuda 1982) or, if the star was designated spectroscopically as n or nn, assuming that Vsin i > 250 km s -1 . This technique has been applied to B stars in NGC 129 by Turner, Forbes, & Pedreros ( 1992) with reasonable success.…”
Section: Sjv Velorummentioning
confidence: 99%