2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical investigation of gully widening rates in upland concentrated flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The displayed incision illustrates a constant cutting into the substrate at a more or less 45° angle. This process is dependent on the erodibility of the material as a less erodible layer would cause lateral growth and reduce deepening [48]. Figure 14 demonstrates a possible final output of a SfM workflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The displayed incision illustrates a constant cutting into the substrate at a more or less 45° angle. This process is dependent on the erodibility of the material as a less erodible layer would cause lateral growth and reduce deepening [48]. Figure 14 demonstrates a possible final output of a SfM workflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No clear rill incision is evident but a circular hollow form of 25 m in diameter and 1.5 m in depth developed. Besides the weak inclination of the terrain, Wells et al (2013) [48] suggest another explanation contributing to the shape of GCH by connecting lower incision rates and thus widening to a less erodible soil layer. In rainfall simulations, measured sediment loads were low in comparison to other test sites in the research area, which can be explained by physical and biological soil crusts covering parts of GCH [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These determinations assume that the depth of erosion was achieved instantaneously or over a short period of time. In low intensity runoff events, rills and shallow gullies would likely erode gradually to shallow depths and produce sediment with an upland signature, while in high-intensity runoff events, thicker layers would likely be eroded especially if erosion occurs as headcuts or knickpoints in the gullies (Bennett et al 2000;Wells et al 2009Wells et al , 2013, resulting in more channel-like signatures. Studies of the eight watersheds indicate that gully processes were not important on most of the watersheds and thus fine sediment contributions from gullies for the measured storms were likely insignificant.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel width has also been modeled by Wells et al, (2013) who found that both slope and discharge play a role in setting channel width. This relationship was tested for the results of these experiments, yet it was not as strong as the relationship with 5 discharge alone.…”
Section: Discussion 15mentioning
confidence: 99%