2014
DOI: 10.14453/aabfj.v8i2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Investigation of the Ohlson Model–A Panel Cointegration Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ohlson's model has been used in a variety of scenarios other than bankruptcy. For example, Lee et al (2014) evaluated the predictive power of the Ohlson model for future market value assessment. Noga and Schnader, (2013) expanded on Ohlson's model by investigating the association between abnormal changes in book-tax differences (BTDs) and bankruptcy using a hazard model and out-of-sample testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ohlson's model has been used in a variety of scenarios other than bankruptcy. For example, Lee et al (2014) evaluated the predictive power of the Ohlson model for future market value assessment. Noga and Schnader, (2013) expanded on Ohlson's model by investigating the association between abnormal changes in book-tax differences (BTDs) and bankruptcy using a hazard model and out-of-sample testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ohlson model demonstrates a long-run equilibrium relationship between stock price and the fundamental value of companies and, in the same time, has better ability to predict future stock price for different time horizons (Lee, Chen, & Tsa, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omelka et al (2013) compare the financial distress model then Chen et al (1995) and Dolejšová (2015) stated that to obtain appropriate results, it is best to use more than two prediction models. Lee et al (2014) tested the Ohlson model and found that it can forecast future stock price movement with greater accuracy than any other prediction method. Lee et al (2014) findings are supported by Lundholm (1995).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%