An empirical study of EIA litigation involving energy facilities in Chile and Colombia

Abstract

In Latin America, as elsewhere, environmental and participatory rights have been expanding, and EIAs have been central to those efforts. In response, litigation against EIAs has increased as communities turn to the courts to exercise these rights, raising fears among developers that costs associated with EIAs and resulting litigation are excessive and a deterrent on economic growth. In many jurisdictions, including Chile and Colombia, these fears have prompted reforms to streamline EIA procedures. This study empirically examines the frequency and results of litigation against EIAs in Chile and Colombia for developers, communities, and state agencies. We compiled two databases of litigation against energy facilities that received EIA licenses between the 1990s/2000 (when EIAs were first required) and 2016. Because some, but not all, energy facilities are contested, this sector is ideal for examining litigation trends. Using descriptive and cross-tabular statistics, our analysis echoes recent research that finds that few EIAs are litigated in court. Litigation is a fundamental tool for civil society organizations seeking to safeguard environmental and participatory rights, although the number of cases invoking these rights remains smaller than for other reasons. Practices across Chile and Colombia differ regarding what kinds of cases individuals bring and the rate at which courts accept cases brought by civil society organizations or corporations. Past litigation trends also suggest that a shift towards renewable energy sources could lead to a decrease in litigation.

A framework of NGO inside and outside strategies in the commercial determinants of health: findings from a narrative review

“…Finally, NGOs targeted government and/or intergovernmental actors directly through litigation in 22 studies [ 23 , 27 , 33 , 40 , 72 , 74 , 77 , 79 , 81 , 82 , 85 , 87 , 90 , 114 , 124 , 137 , 139 , 144 – 148 ]. In these studies, NGOs targeted government rather than industry as above.…”

Enforcing Citizen Participation Through Litigation: Analyzing the Outcomes of Anti-Dam Movements in Brazil and Chile

“…While the creation of Environmental Courts was an important step toward wider access to justice, the OECD (2016, 28) still noted that in reality, “[in Chile] the high cost of legal counsel often puts this access out of reach of NGOs and citizens.” This is very likely the reason that the most common legal action communities use against EIAs is judicial review ( recurso de protección , RP). RPs are court actions that aim to protect citizens from arbitrary acts or omissions by public authorities (Barandiarán and Rubiano-Galvis 2019). RPs’ popularity rests on accessibility and affordability: they are filed directly with the local Corte de Apelación , the highest tribunal in each province, and Chile’s Supreme Court can hear the appeals.…”

Overflow: The oppositional life of an environmental impact study in a Senegalese mining negotiation

“…Yet EIAs often become central to debates about controversial projects (H ebert, 2016;Barandiara´n, 2020;Barandiara´n and Rubiano-Galvis 2019;Aguilar-Støen and Hirsch, 2017;Hoogeveen, 2016;McCreary et al, 2016)-not least because in many cases they are the only avenue for public engagement. The concepts of overflow and oppositional life offer a way of thinking about important debates around EIAs and what (if anything) they accomplish.…”