1998
DOI: 10.1080/02642069800000017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study of Servqual's Dimensionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
99
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
99
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The items within the construct loaded on wrong constructs or across several of them (e.g., reliability, interface design) revealing its problematic nature. This result is aligned with the prior studies' findings, which reported unstable nature of some SERVQUAL constructs (e.g., Llosa et al, 1998;Yang, 2001). Owing to its unstable nature, it was dropped from the m-learning service quality model.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The items within the construct loaded on wrong constructs or across several of them (e.g., reliability, interface design) revealing its problematic nature. This result is aligned with the prior studies' findings, which reported unstable nature of some SERVQUAL constructs (e.g., Llosa et al, 1998;Yang, 2001). Owing to its unstable nature, it was dropped from the m-learning service quality model.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Babakus and Mangold (1989) and Cronin and Taylor (1992;1994) considered SERVQUAL as 'undimensionable' because they do not confirm the scale structure. Llosa et al (1998) disagreed with the last criticism, but did find that the 22 items of the SERVQUAL scale do not clearly evoke, in respondents' minds, the five service quality dimensions. In fact, using a revised SERVQUAL scale, Parasuraman et al (1994) moved away from their original five dimensions to three: reliability, tangibles, and a single factor for responsiveness, assurance and empathy.…”
Section: Measuring Service Qualitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…SERVQUAL is a concise scale, easy to use by managers, and is now referred to as a standard by other service researchers (Llosa, Chandon, and Orsingher 1998). The scale has been replicated in many different service categories so as to examine its generalisability.…”
Section: Measuring Service Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kadar pričakovanja niso potrjena, se pojavijo negativni razkoraki, kar nakazuje na nekakovost storitve. SERVQUAL so v svojih delih kritizirali številni raziskovalci (Buttle, 1996;Carman, 1990;Cronin in Taylor, 1994;Llosa, Chandon in Orsingher, 1998;Tribe in Snaith, 1998). Ladhari (2008, str.…”
Section: Instrument Servqual In Njegove Izpeljankeunclassified