1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1061-9518(96)90007-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of the effects of audit committees, disclosure of nonaudit fees, and other issues on audit independence: Malaysian evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High fee paid to auditors is viewed as impairing the auditor's independence in discharging their responsibilities. Result is consistent with earlier findings by [4] and [23] and [24] whom also found negative perceptions on high fees.…”
Section: Ols Regression Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…High fee paid to auditors is viewed as impairing the auditor's independence in discharging their responsibilities. Result is consistent with earlier findings by [4] and [23] and [24] whom also found negative perceptions on high fees.…”
Section: Ols Regression Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Survey approach requires researchers to conduct surveys on auditors and financial statement users regarding their perception on an auditor's independence [4], [5], [23], [24]. However, there has been evidence on the existence of expectation gaps between the subjects.…”
Section: B Auditor Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) The effects of gifts (pany and Reckers, 1980); (2) The purchase discount arrangement (pany and Reckers, 1980); (3) The audit firm size (Shockley, 1981;Gul, 1989); (4) The provision of management advisory services (MAS) by the audit firm (Shockley, 1981;Knapp, 1985;Gul, 1989;Bartlett, 1993;Teoh and Lim, 1996;Abu Bakar et al 2005);…”
Section: Factors Affecting To Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) The client's financial condition (Knapp, 1985;Gul, 1989;Gul and Tsui, 1992); (6) The nature of conflict issue (Knapp, 1985); (7) The audit firm's tenure (Shockley, 1981;Teoh and Lim, 1996); (8) The degree of competition in the audit services market (Knapp, 1985;Gul, 1989); (9) The size of the audit fees or relative client size (Gul and Tsui, 1992;Bartlett, 1993;Teoh and Lim, 1996;Pany and Reckers, 1980); (10) The audit committee (Gul, 1989;Teoh and Lim, 1996); and (11) Practicing non-audit services (NAS) by auditors (Beattie et al, 1999 and Rayhunadan;.…”
Section: Factors Affecting To Independencementioning
confidence: 99%