2011 IEEE International Conference on Web Services 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icws.2011.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Study on Web Service Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze the evolution of WSDL 1 interfaces, Fokaefs et al [6] propose a tool called VTracker. This tool is based on the Zhang-Shashas tree-edit distance [20] comparing WSDL interfaces as XML 2 documents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze the evolution of WSDL 1 interfaces, Fokaefs et al [6] propose a tool called VTracker. This tool is based on the Zhang-Shashas tree-edit distance [20] comparing WSDL interfaces as XML 2 documents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers, such as Li et al [6] and Romano and Pinzger [7], presented important empirical studies about the most common types of service changes. Fokaefs et al [8] also published empirical results of evolution scenarios, and presented the VTracker tool, which can be used to automatically identify changes between different versions of a service. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some specification mapping variants also consider program behaviour and post conditions. Despite apparent similarity of signature matching and web service matching, better scrutinization shows different level of expressiveness and data structures, makes naïve application of methods in one domain inefficient in the other, however there has been successful adaptations in the similar problems [9], [10]. In [9], Stroulia et al computed structural and semantic similarity of web services for the web service discovery, leveraging from mainly signature matching methods.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%