An Empirical Test of the Materialist Framework for Understanding the General Population's Reaction to Nonpersonalized Genetic Health Messages

Abstract

Genetic health messages are increasingly prevalent in our society. The materialist framework of laypeople's genetic knowledge may provide a good basis for understanding the effects of such messages on preventive behavior and related health cognitions. This study provides an empirical test of the predictions of this framework. We presented 929 participants who were aware or unaware of the existence of genetic risk factors for salt sensitivity with either a genetic health message or a general health message about salt sensitivity. Baseline, immediate follow-up, 1-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up questionnaires assessed risk perception, intention, and salt consumption. Compared with the general health message, previously unaware participants reported lower susceptibility to, and lower severity of, salt sensitivity and lower intentions to restrict salt intake immediately after reading the genetic health message, but not at the 1- and 6-month follow-ups. No such effects were observed for previously aware participants. In addition, the authors observed no effect of health message type on self-reported salt consumption. The authors' findings support the validity of the materialist framework for understanding laypeople's knowledge of genetics. On the basis of the results, several implications were deduced for public education of genetics.

The Role of Affect and Cognition in Processing Messages about Early Diagnosis for Alzheimer’s Disease by Older People

“…The current approach to awareness messages could also be tested for different health issues, for example, in the area of cancer screening [43]. Investigating the impact of message components and affective and cognitive responses to messages on various aspects of behavioral intention and behavior itself, such as a visit to a doctor, a search for more information, and vigilance about early warning signals, is yet another avenue for further research.…”

Cardiac Genetic Testing: A Single-Center Pilot Study of a Dominican Population

“…Persistence of misunderstandings, despite realization of their inaccuracy, suggests that providers need to address not just cognitive facts but underlying emotional issues when caring for individuals and families. Although several recent studies have found that the general public holds a favorable view of diagnostic genetic testing, a significant lack of knowledge exists in understanding the basic principles of inheritance (Smerecnik, Mesters, de Vries, & de Vries, 2011).…”