2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical workflow to integrate uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to evaluate agent-based simulation outputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we are dealing primarily with biophysical and bio-economic inputs, the resulting simulations cannot be contrasted in a statistical sense, because the simulations reflect the inputs and equations used in the model (rather than real differences between measured parameters). Sensitivity analyses [42] was conducted using a 'one-at-a-time' approach was to examine the sensitivity of a range of model input parameters. Boolean parameters (Irrigation presence and Quantity parameters) were tested as on/off.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we are dealing primarily with biophysical and bio-economic inputs, the resulting simulations cannot be contrasted in a statistical sense, because the simulations reflect the inputs and equations used in the model (rather than real differences between measured parameters). Sensitivity analyses [42] was conducted using a 'one-at-a-time' approach was to examine the sensitivity of a range of model input parameters. Boolean parameters (Irrigation presence and Quantity parameters) were tested as on/off.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it captures the essence of what we desire: estimates of ( ≻ ) that are robust to within-model stochasticity. We considered using the approach presented in Abreu and Ralha (2018), but the coefficient of variation (i.e., the standard deviation of ( ≻ ) divided by the mean) is unstable with estimates near zero. Additionally, we considered the approach presented in Law (2008) (pg.…”
Section: Appendix 2 Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that the uncertainty in ABM arises from the nature of complex systems they try to represent and is an important issue for the validation of these models. Recent studies have focused on uncertainty analysis in ABM (Abreu & Ralha, 2018;Baustert & Benetto, 2017;Lee et al, 2015;Ligmann-Zielinska & Sun, 2010). However, in the present research the ABM is intended to educate and to motivate for cooperation in small communities, more than to predict system-social behaviour itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%