2015 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-Sscc) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/asscc.2015.7387473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An energy efficient 18Gbps LDPC decoding processor for 802.11ad in 28nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table II presents a summary of key data and comparisons with a selection of previously published LDPC decoders. A state-of-the-art MSA-based LDPC decoder ASIC implemented in 28 nm technology is presented in [3]. Our implementation achieves 4 times higher area efficiency and over 30 times lower energy per bit.…”
Section: Chip Implementation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table II presents a summary of key data and comparisons with a selection of previously published LDPC decoders. A state-of-the-art MSA-based LDPC decoder ASIC implemented in 28 nm technology is presented in [3]. Our implementation achieves 4 times higher area efficiency and over 30 times lower energy per bit.…”
Section: Chip Implementation and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, decoders using iterative message-passing algorithms such as the min-sum algorithm (MSA) are very costly in terms of silicon area and power, making performance-cost tradeoffs necessary. Prior decoder implementations have addressed these problems with voltage-frequency scaling (VFS) in conjunction with partially parallel or layered architectures [1] [2] [3], serialized message passing [4], bi-directional message passing circuitry [5], or using refresh-free embedded dynamic random access memory (eDRAM) in lieu of registers [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the channel observation, it is clear that the wireless VR system over 60 GHz RFIC should recover a number of burst errors. For some specifications targeting the high-speed near-field wireless communications, several candidates can support such a channel condition with different types of codes including low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes targeting the data rate of more than 6 Gbps [9][10][11][12]17]. However, the previous standards are normally defined to support various applications and thus they include several complicated processing steps to ensure the data integrity for different transmitting scenarios.…”
Section: Baseband Processing With Block-level Interleaved-bch Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FB1 FB2 FB3 High-speed serializer High-speed de-serializer To provide the quantitative comparisons, we summarize the error-correcting performances and the implementation results for different ECC decoding architectures, as depicted in Figure 10 and Table 2, respectively. Compared to the proposed interleaved-BCH code, it is noticeable that the low-rate ECCs for the existing wireless communications, i.e., the 0.5-rate polar code for 5G systems [23] and the 0.5-rate LDPC code for WiGig standards [11,12], provide superior correcting powers, as depicted in Figure 10. However, the baseband systems based on these soft-decision ECCs normally include complicated processing steps associated with high-resolution ADCs, drastically increasing the transmission latency and the energy consumption, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Fb0mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation