2014
DOI: 10.3390/s140815163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Energy Efficient Distance-Aware Routing Algorithm with Multiple Mobile Sinks for Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Traffic patterns in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) usually follow a many-to-one model. Sensor nodes close to static sinks will deplete their limited energy more rapidly than other sensors, since they will have more data to forward during multihop transmission. This will cause network partition, isolated nodes and much shortened network lifetime. Thus, how to balance energy consumption for sensor nodes is an important research issue. In recent years, exploiting sink mobility technology in WSNs has attracted mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How to choose the direction of the sink node motion to optimize total transmission energy for the top two relay nodes in PT. Wang et al [15] and Dandekar and Deshmukh [16] refers the optimal search with multiple hop transmission. Balancing the interest of the relay node A and B changes the slope of the sink node travel path.…”
Section: Intelligent Positioning For a Sink Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to choose the direction of the sink node motion to optimize total transmission energy for the top two relay nodes in PT. Wang et al [15] and Dandekar and Deshmukh [16] refers the optimal search with multiple hop transmission. Balancing the interest of the relay node A and B changes the slope of the sink node travel path.…”
Section: Intelligent Positioning For a Sink Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (19), the increase in radio transmission range of each CH depends on its residual energy. Thus, it guarantees the energy balance among sensor nodes in the network.…”
Section: A Evaluating Ch Transmission Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we evaluate the performance of two scenarios of the OMS algorithm (we define scenario 1 as OMS1 and scenario 2 as OMS2) by comparing them with two other conventional strategies: (i) static sink, where a stationary sink node is located at the center of the network B 0 (150,150); (ii) random moving strategy, where an MS moves randomly in the sensing field; and (iii) MSs moving along the boundary of the network as proposed in [19]. Figure 8 depicts the comparison of the network lifetime between these five schemes.…”
Section: B Performance Analysis Of the Mobile Sink Trajectory Optimimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, since the radio part is frequently the most power-hungry characteristic of a WSN node, the appropriate control of the duty cycle is significant to extend the battery life. For instance, the amount of consumed power could be significantly diminished through energy-efficient routing schemes [34,35] to find, among all the possible communication paths, which one lessens the energy consumption. Besides, the nodes can be grouped through a clustering algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%