2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2013.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An enhanced smart card based remote user password authentication scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
154
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Shimizu et al [4] showed that the Lamport's scheme [3] suffers from different attacks. After that so many remote user authentication schemes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] have been proposed in this regard which are based on only password. But, the researchers have considered biometric feature [2] with the password to enhance the security label.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Shimizu et al [4] showed that the Lamport's scheme [3] suffers from different attacks. After that so many remote user authentication schemes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] have been proposed in this regard which are based on only password. But, the researchers have considered biometric feature [2] with the password to enhance the security label.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, the server provides the user with his smart card used in the login and authentication phases. There are many schemes [25][26][27] based on this traditional model that have faced several issues such as failing to preserve user's anonymity, not being able to resist well-known attacks, and not having the ability to use revocation features when the legitimate user loses or has his smart card stolen.…”
Section: Our Proposed Scheme For Design Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this scheme was also proved by Kumari and Khan [34] it suffered from insider attack and impersonation attack. Li et al [35], in 2013, reanalyzed Chen et al 's scheme and then indicated that it cannot promise forward secrecy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%