2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1909.02059
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Entity-Driven Framework for Abstractive Summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, although named entities have been extensively studied to convey the semantics of an article (news, scientific, social media) and the saliency of individual sentences [18] within an article, they have not been widely used as part of modeling abstractive summarization. [17] performed entityaware single-document abstractive summarization using reinforcement learning for training. Their pipeline-based approach consists of an entity-aware content selection module and abstract generation module.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, although named entities have been extensively studied to convey the semantics of an article (news, scientific, social media) and the saliency of individual sentences [18] within an article, they have not been widely used as part of modeling abstractive summarization. [17] performed entityaware single-document abstractive summarization using reinforcement learning for training. Their pipeline-based approach consists of an entity-aware content selection module and abstract generation module.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of named entities to guide abstractive summarization of news articles has been explored in recent studies by [17]- [20]. However, these studies do not leverage named entitydriven facts from background knowledge bases to guide abstractive summary generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic text summarization is a challenging task of condensing the salient information from the source document into a shorter format. Two main categories are typically involved in the text summarization task, one is extractive approach (Cheng and Lapata, 2016;Nallapati et al, 2016a;Xiao and Carenini, 2019;Cui et al, 2020) which directly extracts salient sentences from the input text as the summary, and the other is abstractive approach (Sutskever et al, 2014;See et al, 2017;Cohan et al, 2018;Sharma et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2020) which imitates human behaviour to produce new sentences based on the extracted information from the source document. Traditional extractive summarization methods are mostly unsupervised, extracting sentences based on n-grams overlap (Nenkova and Vanderwende, 2005), relying on graph-based methods for sentence ranking (Mihalcea and Tarau, 2004;Erkan and Radev, 2004), or identifying important sentences with a latent semantic analysis technique (Steinberger and Jezek, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other idea is to use a select and generate framework, where an extractor selects salient sentences, then an abstractor generates a summary. The most recent frameworks based on this hybrid paradigm either follow a two-stage pipeline (Chen and Bansal 2018;Sharma et al 2019) or an end-to-end learning approach (Hsu et al 2018;Shen et al 2019;Gehrmann, Deng, and Rush 2018). The most appealing advantage is to explicitly obtain desirable content of the sources, such as entity-aware selection (Sharma et al 2019) or word selection through latent switch variables (Gehrmann, Deng, and Rush 2018;Shen et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%