2017
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An epigenetic aging clock for dogs and wolves

Abstract: Several articles describe highly accurate age estimation methods based on human DNA-methylation data. It is not yet known whether similar epigenetic aging clocks can be developed based on blood methylation data from canids. Using Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing, we assessed blood DNA-methylation data from 46 domesticated dogs (Canis familiaris) and 62 wild gray wolves (C. lupus). By regressing chronological dog age on the resulting CpGs, we defined highly accurate multivariate age estimators for do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
164
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
9
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following repeated cross‐validation of our known‐age samples to train and test the age estimation model, we reported a test set MAD for all ages of 2.81 ± 2.08 years. The linear relationship with age in these CpG sites is not as strong as those reported for whales (Polanowski, Robbins, Chandler, & Jarman, ) or dogs (Thompson, vonHoldt, Horvath, & Pellegrini, ), but was similar to that reported for a bat species (Wright et al, ). We also observed variation in MAD for different age classes, with birds aged 5–9 years and 19+ providing less accurate age estimates compared to other groups (Figure a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Following repeated cross‐validation of our known‐age samples to train and test the age estimation model, we reported a test set MAD for all ages of 2.81 ± 2.08 years. The linear relationship with age in these CpG sites is not as strong as those reported for whales (Polanowski, Robbins, Chandler, & Jarman, ) or dogs (Thompson, vonHoldt, Horvath, & Pellegrini, ), but was similar to that reported for a bat species (Wright et al, ). We also observed variation in MAD for different age classes, with birds aged 5–9 years and 19+ providing less accurate age estimates compared to other groups (Figure a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is the first epigenetic age assay developed for monitoring bats, a taxon which forms a third of all mammalian species, and only the third designed for use on a wild species after humpback whales (Polanowski et al., ) and wolves ( Canis lupus ) (Thompson, vonHoldt, Horvath, & Pellegrini, ). The age prediction model developed explained 64% of the variance and predicted age from wing punches with a standard deviation of 1.52 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the basic features of DNA methylation are conserved at least in closely related species or even taxa, the epigenetic clock based on the same informative CpGs identified in humans was found to also work reasonably well in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) (Horvath, 2013). Since then, species-specific epigenetic clocks have been constructed in chimpanzees (Ito, Udono, Hirata, & Inoue-Murayama, 2018), mice (Han et al, 2018), humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) (Polanowski, Robbins, Chandler, & Jarman, 2014), Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteinii) (Wright et al, 2018), dogs and wolves (Janowitz Koch et al, 2016;Thompson, vonHoldt, Horvath, & Pellegrini, 2017) and in a long-lived seabird (Ardenna tenuirostris) (Paoli-Iseppi et al, 2019). Epigenetic clocks are characterized by very high accuracy when compared to more traditional methods of age estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%