2017
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201708635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Epitope‐Imprinted Biointerface with Dynamic Bioactivity for Modulating Cell–Biomaterial Interactions

Abstract: In this study, an epitope‐imprinting strategy was employed for the dynamic display of bioactive ligands on a material interface. An imprinted surface was initially designed to exhibit specific affinity towards a short peptide (i.e., the epitope). This surface was subsequently used to anchor an epitope‐tagged cell‐adhesive peptide ligand (RGD: Arg‐Gly‐Asp). Owing to reversible epitope‐binding affinity, ligand presentation and thereby cell adhesion could be controlled. As compared to current strategies for the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analysis showed that the live cells on FN-MIP membrane were higher than those on NIP membrane because the FN-MIP membrane could adsorb more FN than NIP membrane, which made it was more suitable for the adhesion and growth of cells. Pan et al [ 42 , 43 ] introduced the cell-adhesive peptide (RGDS) onto a thermo-responsive cell culture substrate. The substrate could be used as a highly efficient novel system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis showed that the live cells on FN-MIP membrane were higher than those on NIP membrane because the FN-MIP membrane could adsorb more FN than NIP membrane, which made it was more suitable for the adhesion and growth of cells. Pan et al [ 42 , 43 ] introduced the cell-adhesive peptide (RGDS) onto a thermo-responsive cell culture substrate. The substrate could be used as a highly efficient novel system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[189] Another good example of the use of MI was presented by Pan et al In this work, epitope imprinting was applied to create a biointerface with dynamic bioactivity, allowing easy harvesting of cell sheets without interfering with cell viability. [195] The authors designed a carboxyl-rich peptide (DDDGGDDD) which was used to imprint a benzamidine-based polymeric surface. This could then be used to capture another peptide, DDDGGDDDSSSSSRGDS, comprising three components.…”
Section: Next-generation Synthetic Platforms With Abiotic Affinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This caused the release of attached fibroblasts, with over 90% of cells detaching after 12 h. Importantly, detached cells could then be cultured again on a new Petri dish, thus implying that the molecule-exchange-induced cell release occurs in a noninvasive manner. [195] While they may be few, these constitute promising first steps to take advantage of synthetic materials and technologies to produce biomaterials with selective recognition properties. Many of the pitfalls that have been pointed out for other platforms Figure 5.…”
Section: Next-generation Synthetic Platforms With Abiotic Affinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent paper by the same authors, microcontact printing was used to imprint a surface with RGD. The authors showed the ability of the imprinted surface to reversibly bind and re-bind the peptide, effectively creating a platform with tunable cell-adhesion properties [94].…”
Section: Molecular Imprinting To Introduce Chemical Cues Inside the Smentioning
confidence: 99%