2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03787-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An equivalent geometry model for turning tool with nose and edge radii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endres and Waldorf [8] introduced a nonlinear relationship among the unit friction, cutting force and the chip thickness by considering the size effect of rounded edge on the tool nose. Khlifi et al [9]. applied an equivalent tool geometry method to induce the same cutting force components as the real tool while taking into account the radius of the tool nose and edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endres and Waldorf [8] introduced a nonlinear relationship among the unit friction, cutting force and the chip thickness by considering the size effect of rounded edge on the tool nose. Khlifi et al [9]. applied an equivalent tool geometry method to induce the same cutting force components as the real tool while taking into account the radius of the tool nose and edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent geometry is defined while conserving the same uncut chip area and values of the cutting force components compared to real cutting geometry [15].…”
Section: Equivalent Cutting For Turning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present research work, equivalent parameters are defined using the work of Khlifi et al [15].…”
Section: Equivalent Cutting For Turning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Bushlya et al proposed the chip area and tool geometry models when oblique turning with round tools [27]. Khlifi et al modeled the turning process by the equivalent cutting-edge, which theoretically induced the same CF components as the real tool [28]. And Orra and 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%