2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ergonomic assessment tool for evaluating the effect of back exoskeletons on injury risk

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LBD risk assessment accuracy has not yet been studied for trunk IMU and pressure insole systems. Furthermore, it is currently unclear what level of biomechanical load accuracy is good enough for ergonomic assessment in practice, particularly given the nonlinear relationships between musculoskeletal load, damage, and injury risk [ 6 , 12 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBD risk assessment accuracy has not yet been studied for trunk IMU and pressure insole systems. Furthermore, it is currently unclear what level of biomechanical load accuracy is good enough for ergonomic assessment in practice, particularly given the nonlinear relationships between musculoskeletal load, damage, and injury risk [ 6 , 12 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In occupational settings, exos have been shown to decrease muscle activity and fatigue [ 6 , 41 ], thus increased exo adoption could reduce the risk of overuse injury, as well as increase productivity. Ergonomic assessment tools (e.g., [ 42 ]) suggest that, under various conditions, it is possible to simultaneously reduce injury risk and increase productivity (e.g., number of lifting repetitions) when wearing an exo. This highlights how exos fit within and contribute to emerging trends, such as sustainable work and industry 5.0, which place the long-term wellbeing of the worker at the center of the process, and leverage collaboration between humans and machines to benefit industry, workers, and society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still little consensus among scientists about the most effective means of achieving this objective. As a result, various robot structures and control algorithms for robotic treatment have been developed on an as-needed basis, often utilizing ideas from the literature on rehabilitation, neurology, and motor learning [ 24 ]. The assistive control paradigm is the most advanced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%