Visual categorization improves when object-context associations in scenes are semantically consistent, thus predictable from schemas stored in long-term memory. However, it is unclear whether this is due to differences in early perceptual processing, in matching of memory representations or in later stages of response selection. We tested these three concurrent explanations across five experiments. At each trial, participants had to categorize a scene context and an object briefly presented within the same image (Experiment 1), or separately in simultaneous images (Experiments 2-5). We analyzed unilateral (Experiments 1, 3) and bilateral presentations (Experiments 2, 4, 5), and presentations on the screen's horizontal midline (Experiments 1-2) and in the upper and lower visual fields (Experiments 3, 4). In all the experiments, we found a semantic consistency advantage for both context categorization and object categorization. this shows that the memory for object-context semantic associations is activated regardless of whether these two scene components are integrated in the same percept. Our study suggests that the facilitation effect of semantic consistency on categorization occurs at the stage of matching the percept with previous knowledge, supporting the object selection account and extending this framework to an object-context reciprocal influence on matching processes (objectcontext selection account). Viewers are able to categorize visual images from a brief glance, in a few dozens of milliseconds 1. This ability is a central dimension of cognition 2 : We make sense of the world fundamentally by relating and differentiating its components in terms of known groups, or categories 3,4. This allows us to process large amounts of information, while minimizing cognitive costs, and perceive common structures of elements 4 , even within the complex scenes that characterize everyday visual world. These scenes are composed of multiple objects, organized within a background (the scene's context) following semantic and spatial rules, which define the plausibility of object occurrence in the scene and of the scene's layout, respectively 5. Object-context associations are at the core of the concept of "scene" and a key, omnipresent aspect in our visual experience. However, it is still unclear how they influence visual information processing, namely in which conditions and at what stage they operate. Many studies have focused on the plausibility of object occurrence and have shown better categorization performance in the case of consistent, expected associations than inconsistent, unexpected associations. This semantic consistency advantage has been mainly found for categorization of the objects (e.g., "parasol", "notebook") included in the scene 6-10 but also for the categorization of the scene's context 7,11,12 in terms of its gist 13 (e.g., "beach", "office"). Several studies using even-related potentials (ERPs) 14-18 have reliably reported a greater N400 evoked by inconsistent objects, and interpreted it as reflecti...