2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015jd023512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation and regional error modeling methodology for near-real-time satellite rainfall data over Australia

Abstract: In providing uniform spatial coverage, satellite‐based rainfall estimates can potentially benefit hydrological modeling, particularly for flood prediction. Maximizing the value of information from such data requires knowledge of its error. The most recent Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B42RT (TRMM‐RT) satellite product version 7 (v7) was used for examining evaluation procedures against in situ gauge data across mainland Australia at a daily time step, over a 9 year period. This provides insights i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 4, it is observed a high proportion (approximately 60% of SPE's detections) of sever overestimation for all five SPEs, but the components of sever overestimation are different. In other words, the SPE usually overestimate the light rain but underestimate the medium-to-heavy rain (>20 mm/day) (Pipunic et al, 2015;Yong et al, 2010). With regard to severe underestimation, for all five SPEs, the fraction of it is relatively low (approximately 17% of SPE's detections).…”
Section: Grid-scale Errors In Imerg and Tmpa Productsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…From Figure 4, it is observed a high proportion (approximately 60% of SPE's detections) of sever overestimation for all five SPEs, but the components of sever overestimation are different. In other words, the SPE usually overestimate the light rain but underestimate the medium-to-heavy rain (>20 mm/day) (Pipunic et al, 2015;Yong et al, 2010). With regard to severe underestimation, for all five SPEs, the fraction of it is relatively low (approximately 17% of SPE's detections).…”
Section: Grid-scale Errors In Imerg and Tmpa Productsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Water 2017, 9, 57 6 of 15 contrast, the poor performance of the TMPA-3B43 in the dry season could be attributed to poor detection capability in light precipitation (less than 3 mm/day) [46]. Larger RMSE values were found during the wet season (e.g., SON and DJF) because of the scaling up effect of the precipitation rate from an hourly to monthly scale.…”
Section: Spatial Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The most widely used products include the Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH) [1], the European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT)'s Multi-sensor Precipitation Estimate (MPE) [2], the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)'s Era-Interim product [3], the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN), the PERSIANN Cloud Classification System estimation (PERSIANN-CCS) [4], the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis products (TMPA) versions 6 (3B42-V6) and 7 (3B42-V7) [5,6] and the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) product [7]. Numerous studies have been made to evaluate the performance of these precipitation satellite products on the regional and global scale (e.g., Asia [8][9][10][11], North and Central America [12][13][14][15][16], South America [17][18][19][20], Europe [21][22][23][24], Australia [25][26][27][28], Oceans [29,30], other [31][32][33][34][35][36] and in Pakistan [37][38][39][40][41]...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%